Learnify Academy is a tuition centre in Bahrain. Classes are for students in Bahrain only.Tuition classes in Bahrain only

Varignon parallelogram · 3 marks

Let P, Q, R, S be four points on sides AB, BC, CD and DA respectively of a quadrilateral ABCD. Suppose PQRS is a parallelogram. Must P, Q, R and S be midpoints of the respective sides? This can be considered a possible converse question to the Midpoint Theorem for Quadrilaterals.

Answer: No. In a square ABCD of side 4, take AP = BQ = CR = DS = 1. The four corner triangles are congruent (SAS), so PQ = QR = RS = SP: PQRS is a rhombus (in fact a square), hence a parallelogram, but none of P, Q, R, S is a midpoint.

Step-by-step solution

Idea: To show “must” is false, one counterexample is enough. A square has so much symmetry that points equally far round each side always make a parallelogram.

ABCDPQRS
  1. Take square ABCD with side 4 and points P on AB, Q on BC, R on CD, S on DA with AP = BQ = CR = DS = 1. Then PB = QC = RD = SA = 3.1 mark
  2. Triangles PBQ, QCR, RDS, SAP each have a right angle between sides 3 and 1, so they are congruent (SAS). Hence PQ = QR = RS = SP = √10.1 mark
  3. A quadrilateral with both pairs of opposite sides equal is a parallelogram, so PQRS is a parallelogram, yet P, Q, R, S are not midpoints. So the answer is No. (In any quadrilateral, points at the same fraction t along AB from A, along CB from C, along CD from C and along AD from A also give a parallelogram.)1 mark
No. For example, points one quarter of the way along each side of a square form a parallelogram (a square) without being midpoints.

Check: Coordinates: A(0, 4), B(4, 4), C(4, 0), D(0, 0); P(1, 4), Q(4, 3), R(3, 0), S(0, 1). Q − P = (3, −1) = R − S ✓, so PQRS is a parallelogram.

Answer to write in the exam

Square ABCD, side 4; AP = BQ = CR = DS = 1 ⇒ PB = QC = RD = SA = 3

∆PBQ ≅ ∆QCR ≅ ∆RDS ≅ ∆SAP (SAS: 3, 90°, 1) ⇒ PQ = QR = RS = SP

⇒ PQRS is a parallelogram (opposite sides equal)

P, Q, R, S are not midpoints

∴ No, they need not be midpoints.

Common mistakes that cost marks

  • Answering “yes” because the midpoint case works; the question is whether only midpoints work.
  • Giving a counterexample without proving PQRS is a parallelogram.
  • Picking points where PQRS is not a parallelogram, e.g. AP = 1 but BQ = 2 in a square.

How this can come in the exam

Assertion–Reason (1 mark)

Assertion (A): If P, Q, R, S on the sides of quadrilateral ABCD form a parallelogram, they must be the midpoints of the sides.
Reason (R): The midpoints of the sides of any quadrilateral form a parallelogram.

  1. Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.
  2. Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.
  3. A is true but R is false.
  4. A is false but R is true.
Show answer

(D) A is false but R is true.
R is true (Midpoint Theorem for Quadrilaterals), but A is false: its converse fails, as the quarter-points of a square show.

Try one yourself

In a rectangle ABCD with AB = 8 and BC = 6, take AP = 2 on AB, BQ = 1.5 on BC, CR = 2 on CD and DS = 1.5 on DA. Is PQRS a parallelogram?

Show answer

Yes. ∆PBQ ≅ ∆RDS (PB = RD = 6, BQ = DS = 1.5, right angles) and ∆QCR ≅ ∆SAP (QC = SA = 4.5, CR = AP = 2), so PQ = RS and QR = SP: a parallelogram, though no point is a midpoint.

More questions like this

All Quadrilaterals and parallelograms questions · All maths questions