Is the Midpoint Theorem for Quadrilaterals true when the quadrilateral is non-convex? How about when it is self-intersecting? Experiment and check. The pictures may look strange, but the theorem appears to be true.
- (i) Can you explain why this is so? See the geometric reasoning in the text.
- (ii) There is one exception: In a very special case the Varignon parallelogram becomes a single segment. When will this happen?
- (iii) Does your reasoning apply even when ABCD is non-planar?
Step-by-step solution
Idea: The Varignon argument never used convexity: each side of PQRS joins midpoints of two sides of a triangle with a diagonal of ABCD as third side.
(i) Can you explain why this is so? See the geometric reasoning in the text.
- For any four points A, B, C, D (no three collinear), triangles ABC, ADC, BCD and BAD exist. Midpoint Theorem: PQ ‖ AC and PQ = ½AC (∆ABC); SR ‖ AC and SR = ½AC (∆ADC).1 mark
- So PQ and SR are equal and parallel, and PQRS is a parallelogram. Nothing used whether ABCD is convex, non-convex or self-intersecting.½ mark
(ii) There is one exception: In a very special case the Varignon parallelogram becomes a single segment. When will this happen?
- The sides of PQRS are parallel to AC (PQ, SR) and to BD (QR, PS). If the lines AC and BD are parallel, all four sides lie along one direction, and PQRS flattens into a segment.1 mark
- AC ‖ BD cannot happen in a convex quadrilateral (its diagonals cross) or a non-convex one, but it can in a self-intersecting one: e.g. A(0, 0), B(0, 2), C(4, 0), D(4, 2) gives P(0, 1), Q(2, 1), R(4, 1), S(2, 1): Q = S and PQRS is the segment PR.½ mark
(iii) Does your reasoning apply even when ABCD is non-planar?
- Yes. Each of the triangles ABC, ADC is still a flat triangle, so PQ ‖ AC ‖ SR and PQ = SR = ½AC. Two parallel lines lie in one plane, so P, Q, R, S are coplanar, and PQRS is a parallelogram (one pair of opposite sides equal and parallel).1 mark
Check: Non-planar example: A(0, 0, 0), B(2, 0, 0), C(2, 2, 0), D(0, 2, 2). P(1, 0, 0), Q(2, 1, 0), R(1, 2, 1), S(0, 1, 1). Q − P = (1, 1, 0) = R − S ✓, so PQRS is a parallelogram.
Answer to write in the exam
(i)
∆ABC: PQ ‖ AC, PQ = ½AC; ∆ADC: SR ‖ AC, SR = ½AC (Midpoint Theorem)
⇒ PQ = SR, PQ ‖ SR ⇒ PQRS is a parallelogram
∴ True for non-convex and self-intersecting ABCD (convexity never used)
(ii)
PQ ‖ SR ‖ AC and QR ‖ PS ‖ BD
If AC ‖ BD, all sides of PQRS have one direction ⇒ PQRS is a segment
E.g. A(0, 0), B(0, 2), C(4, 0), D(4, 2): P(0, 1), Q = S = (2, 1), R(4, 1)
∴ Happens exactly when AC ‖ BD (only for a self-intersecting ABCD)
(iii)
∆ABC, ∆ADC are plane triangles ⇒ PQ ‖ AC ‖ SR, PQ = SR = ½AC
Parallel lines PQ, SR lie in one plane ⇒ P, Q, R, S coplanar
∴ PQRS is a parallelogram even for non-planar ABCD
Common mistakes that cost marks
- Saying the theorem fails for a self-intersecting quadrilateral because the picture looks odd. The proof still works.
- In (ii), answering “when ABCD is a parallelogram”. Then PQRS is still a parallelogram; the collapse needs AC ‖ BD.
- In (iii), forgetting to explain why P, Q, R, S lie in one plane.
How this can come in the exam
For any quadrilateral ABCD, the side PQ of its midpoint parallelogram (P on AB, Q on BC) is always
- parallel to BD and half of it
- parallel to AC and half of it
- equal to AB
- perpendicular to AC
Show answer
(B) parallel to AC and half of it
In ∆ABC, P and Q are midpoints of AB and BC, so PQ ‖ AC and PQ = ½AC.
Try one yourself
A(0, 0), B(6, 2), C(2, 2), D(1, 6) form a non-convex quadrilateral. Find its midpoint quadrilateral and check it is a parallelogram.
Show answer
P(3, 1), Q(4, 2), R(1.5, 4), S(0.5, 3). Q − P = (1, 1) = R − S ✓ and R − Q = (−2.5, 2) = S − P ✓: a parallelogram.
More questions like this
- Let P, Q, R, S be four points on sides AB, BC, CD and DA respectively of a quadrilateral ABCD. Suppose PQRS is a parallelogram. Must P, Q, R and S be midpoints of the respective sides? This can be considered a possible converse question to the Midpoint Theorem for Quadrilaterals.
- (i) Complete the following proof of the Midpoint Theorem. Extend segment PQ beyond Q until point S. By how much should we extend PQ? It would be good to be able to prove that ∆APQ ≅ ∆CSQ. (Why?) Use this as a guide to specify the location of S and then complete this proof.
(ii) Give a similar proof of the converse of the Midpoint Theorem. Start by extending PQ up to a suitable point S. - Review all the properties of a rhombus/rectangle/square that you proved earlier. Formulate a converse of each. Decide if the converse is true. There are many possibilities here!
- Show that the sum of angles of a non-planar quadrilateral is always less than 360°. Can you find a non-planar quadrilateral ABCD for which ∠A + ∠B + ∠C + ∠D = 2°? (Hint: Think of a diagonal, say AC, as a hinge around which triangles ABC and ADC can rotate.) What happens to each angle of ABCD as you do this rotation?
- Let us see a third method to tile the plane using a 4-gon. Focus on only two coloured copies of SOME sharing a vertex. What do you see? It appears that each 4-gon is just a shifted copy of the other. Let us see exactly how. Draw two copies of SOME as shown in the figure so that the diagonals EO and EʹOʹ are collinear with O = Eʹ. Now place a cutout of one copy on top of SOME with diagonal EO drawn on it. Slide this cutout so that segment EO moves along EOʹ until EO matches EʹOʹ. Verify that your cutout exactly matches SʹOʹMʹEʹ.
All Quadrilaterals and parallelograms questions · All maths questions