Why do some rational numbers have repeating decimal representations? Imagine calculating 17 using long division. You are dividing by 7. What are the possible remainders at each step? They can only be 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 (why not 0?).
Step-by-step solution
Idea: In long division each step depends only on the current remainder. If a remainder ever comes back, the whole pattern repeats. With only 6 possible remainders, one must come back.
- Dividing by 7, every remainder is one of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.½ mark
- Why not 0? Getting remainder 0 after k steps would mean 7 divides 1 followed by k zeros, i.e. 10k = 2k × 5k. But 7 is a prime that is not 2 or 5, so it never divides 10k. So the remainder is never 0.1 mark
- For 17: 10 ÷ 7 = 1 r 3; 30 ÷ 7 = 4 r 2; 20 ÷ 7 = 2 r 6; 60 ÷ 7 = 8 r 4; 40 ÷ 7 = 5 r 5; 50 ÷ 7 = 7 r 1. Remainder 1 is back, which is where we started.1 mark
- From here the same steps repeat, so the digits 142857 repeat for ever: 17 = 0.142857. With only 6 possible remainders, a repeat must come within 6 steps, so the repeating block has at most 6 digits.½ mark
Check: 0.142857 × 7 = 0.999999, and 142857 × 7 = 999999 = 106 − 1 ✓.
Answer to write in the exam
Possible remainders on dividing by 7: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Remainder 0 ⇒ 7 | 10k = 2k × 5k, impossible (7 is prime, ≠ 2, 5)
∴ Remainders can only be 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
1/7: remainders 3, 2, 6, 4, 5, 1, then repeat; digits 1, 4, 2, 8, 5, 7
∴ 17 = 0.142857 (a remainder must repeat, so the decimal repeats)
Common mistakes that cost marks
- Saying the remainders can be 1 to 7. A remainder is always less than the divisor.
- Saying ‘remainder 0 is impossible because 1 is less than 7’. The real reason is that 7 does not divide any power of 10.
- Thinking the repeating block for 17 could be longer than 6 digits.
How this can come in the exam
The maximum number of digits in the repeating block of 123 is
- 11
- 22
- 23
- infinite
Show answer
(B) 22
There are only 22 non-zero remainders (1–22), so the block has at most 22 digits (for 123 it is exactly 22).
Without dividing, explain why 49 cannot have a terminating decimal expansion.
Show answer
49 is in lowest terms and 9 = 32 (1 mark). A terminating decimal needs a denominator made only of 2s and 5s; 3 never divides a power of 10, so the remainder is never 0 and the decimal repeats (1 mark).Try one yourself
Divide 1 by 7 and 3 by 7. How are the two repeating blocks related?
Show answer
17 = 0.142857 and 37 = 0.428571: the same digits in the same cyclic order, starting at a different place.