Learnify Academy is a tuition centre in Bahrain. Classes are for students in Bahrain only.Tuition classes in Bahrain only

Average of averages · 2 marks

Why did Method 1 not work?

Answer: Method 1 adds the two averages and divides by 2, so it treats the seniors’ average and the juniors’ average equally. But there are 8 seniors and only 3 juniors, so the seniors’ average should count much more.

Step-by-step solution

Given: 8 seniors with average height 165.5 cm; 3 juniors with average height 149.33 cm; Method 1: 165.5 + 149.332 = 157.415 cm; the correct average of all 11 heights is 177211 = 161.09 cm

Idea: An average stands for the whole group behind it. When groups have different sizes, a bigger group must count more in the combined average.

  1. Method 1 works out 165.5 + 149.332. Dividing by 2 means it counts the seniors’ average once and the juniors’ average once, as if there were equally many seniors and juniors.½ mark
  2. In the group, each of the 11 trainees should count once. So the seniors’ average stands for 8 people and should count 8 times; the juniors’ average stands for 3 people and should count 3 times.½ mark
  3. Counting them correctly: 165.5 × 8 + 149.33 × 38 + 3 = 177211 = 161.09 cm. Method 1’s 157.415 cm is too low, because it gives the 3 shorter juniors too much weight.½ mark
  4. So the average of two averages is not the combined average when the groups are of different sizes. Each average must be weighted by the size of its group.½ mark
Method 1 treats the average heights of the seniors and the juniors equally, but there are many more seniors (8) than juniors (3). The combined average must give each group’s average a weight equal to its size, which gives 161.09 cm, not 157.415 cm.

Answer to write in the exam

Method 1 = 165.5 + 149.332 gives equal weight to both groups

But seniors = 8 and juniors = 3, so the groups are of unequal size

Correct average = 165.5 × 8 + 149.33 × 311 = 177211 = 161.09 cm

∴ Method 1 fails because it ignores the different group sizes

Common mistakes that cost marks

  • Saying Method 1 failed because of rounding 149.33. The error (about 3.7 cm) is far too big for rounding; it comes from ignoring group sizes.
  • Thinking an average of averages is always wrong. It is right when all groups have the same size.
  • Explaining only with words like ‘it is wrong’ without showing what the correct weighting (8 and 3) should be.

How this can come in the exam

Assertion–Reason (1 mark)

Assertion (A): If 40 students have an average of 60 and 10 students have an average of 80, the average of all 50 students is 70.
Reason (R): When groups differ in size, each group’s average must be weighted by the size of the group.

  1. Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.
  2. Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.
  3. A is true but R is false.
  4. A is false but R is true.
Show answer

(D) A is false but R is true.
Correct average = 40 × 60 + 10 × 8050 = 320050 = 64, not 70, so A is false. R is true.

Try one yourself

Section P has 10 students with an average of 50 marks and Section Q has 30 students with an average of 90 marks. Riya says the combined average is 70. Is she right?

Show answer

No. Combined average = 10 × 50 + 30 × 9040 = 500 + 270040 = 320040 = 80. Riya averaged the two averages, ignoring that Section Q is three times as large.

More questions like this

All Data and statistics questions · All maths questions