Learnify Academy is a tuition centre in Bahrain. Classes are for students in Bahrain only.Tuition classes in Bahrain only

Quadrants and coordinates · 2 marks

What would a system of coordinates be like if we did not have negative numbers? Would this system allow us to locate all the points on a 2-D plane?

Answer: Only the first quadrant (with the positive halves of the axes) could be described: points to the right of and above the origin. No, it could not locate all points: nothing to the left of the y-axis or below the x-axis could be named.

Step-by-step solution

Idea: Negative coordinates are what describe the points to the left of the y-axis and below the x-axis. Without them, three of the four quadrants disappear.

  1. Without negative numbers, both coordinates must be 0 or positive. So the only points we could describe are on the positive x-axis, the positive y-axis, or in Quadrant I.½ mark
  2. Points in Quadrants II, III and IV, and on the negative halves of the axes, such as (−3, 0) or (2, −5), could not be written at all.½ mark
  3. We could move the origin to the bottom-left corner of a region (as on a computer screen or a page of graph paper), but that covers only that limited region. The plane goes on forever in every direction, so some points would always be left out.½ mark
  4. So no, such a system could not locate all the points of the plane. This is why zero and negative numbers are essential for the four-quadrant plane.½ mark
Without negative numbers the system would only cover the first quadrant and the positive halves of the axes. It would not locate all the points of the plane: points to the left of the y-axis or below the x-axis could not be described.

Check: Of the four sign patterns (+, +), (−, +), (−, −), (+, −), only (+, +) survives without negative numbers: one quadrant out of four ✓.

Answer to write in the exam

Without negative numbers: x ≥ 0 and y ≥ 0 only

Only Quadrant I and the positive halves of the axes can be described.

Points like (−3, 0), (−2, 4), (2, −5) cannot be described.

Moving the origin covers only a limited region; the plane is unlimited.

∴ No, not all points of the plane could be located.

Common mistakes that cost marks

  • Saying “yes, just move the origin”. Moving the origin helps only for a limited region; the plane has no edge.
  • Thinking only Quadrant III is lost. Any point with even one negative coordinate is lost: Quadrants II, III and IV.
  • Forgetting that 0 is still allowed, so points on the positive halves of the axes can still be described.

How this can come in the exam

MCQ (1 mark)

If only non-negative numbers could be used as coordinates, which of these points could be described?

  1. (−1, 4)
  2. (4, −1)
  3. (0, 4)
  4. (−4, −1)
Show answer

(C) (0, 4)
(0, 4) has no negative coordinate; each of the others has at least one.

Assertion–Reason (1 mark)

Assertion (A): Using only non-negative coordinates, the point 3 units to the left of the origin cannot be described.
Reason (R): Without negative numbers, coordinates can describe only points on or to the right of the y-axis and on or above the x-axis.

  1. Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.
  2. Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.
  3. A is true but R is false.
  4. A is false but R is true.
Show answer

(A) Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.
The point is (−3, 0), which needs a negative x-coordinate; R explains why it cannot be described.

Try one yourself

The origin is moved to the point that used to be (−10, −10), and only non-negative coordinates are allowed. What are the new coordinates of the old points (−4, 3) and (0, 0)? Can the old point (−12, 5) be described?

Show answer

New coordinates are old + 10 in each place: (6, 13) and (10, 10). The old point (−12, 5) would become (−2, 15), which needs a negative number, so no.

More questions like this

All Coordinate geometry questions · All maths questions