Learnify Academy is a tuition centre in Bahrain. Classes are for students in Bahrain only.Tuition classes in Bahrain only

Factors and primes · 3 marks

If n is the square of a prime number, then it has exactly 3 factors.

Answer: Converse: If n has exactly 3 factors, then it is the square of a prime number. Both are true. (e.g. 49 = 72 has factors 1, 7, 49.)

Step-by-step solution

Given: n is a positive integer
To find: Frame the converse of this proposition. Then, determine if each of the two statements is true or not. Justify the true statements and give a counterexample for each false statement.

Idea: The factors of p2 can only be built from the prime p: 1, p, p2. Going back, 3 factors is an odd number, so n is a square m2, and m must be prime or there would be extra factors.

  1. Converse: If n has exactly 3 factors, then it is the square of a prime number.½ mark
  2. Proposition — true. Let n = p2 with p prime. A factor of p × p can contain only the prime p, at most twice, so the factors are 1, p, p2: exactly 3. E.g. 25: 1, 5, 25.1 mark
  3. Converse — true. 3 is odd, and a number with an odd number of factors is a perfect square. So n = m2, with m > 1 (because 1 has only one factor). Then 1, m and m2 are three different factors, so they are all of them.½ mark
  4. If m were not prime, it would have a factor d with 1 < d < m; d would be a fourth factor of n. So m is prime and n is the square of a prime. Both statements are true.1 mark
Converse: If n has exactly 3 factors, then it is the square of a prime number. Both the proposition and its converse are true.

Check: Numbers up to 60 with exactly 3 factors: 4, 9, 25, 49 — exactly the squares of the primes 2, 3, 5, 7. A square of a non-prime, such as 36 = 62, has more (9 factors).

Answer to write in the exam

Converse: If n has exactly 3 factors, then it is the square of a prime number.

Proposition: n = p2 (p prime): factors 1, p, p2 only — exactly 3. True.

Converse: 3 factors (odd) ⇒ n is a perfect square, n = m2, m > 1

1, m, m2 are the 3 factors; if m had a factor d, 1 < d < m, d would be a 4th factor

⇒ m is prime. True.

∴ Both the proposition and its converse are true.

Common mistakes that cost marks

  • Listing only 1 and p and forgetting p2 itself.
  • Thinking every perfect square has 3 factors. 36 = 62 has 9 factors because 6 is not prime.
  • Taking n = 1 = 12 as a counterexample to the proposition. 1 is not a prime number, so 1 is not the square of a prime.

How this can come in the exam

MCQ (1 mark)

Which number has exactly 3 factors?

  1. 16
  2. 25
  3. 27
  4. 35
Show answer

(B) 25
25 = 52: factors 1, 5, 25. 16 has 5 factors, and 27 and 35 have 4 each.

Short answer (2 marks)

Find all the numbers between 1 and 60 that have exactly 3 factors.

Show answerThey are the squares of primes (1 mark): 22 = 4, 32 = 9, 52 = 25, 72 = 49 (112 = 121 is too big) (1 mark).

Try one yourself

How many factors does 169 have? List them.

Show answer

169 = 132 and 13 is prime, so it has exactly 3 factors: 1, 13, 169.

More questions like this

All Mathematical reasoning questions · All maths questions