Learnify Academy is a tuition centre in Bahrain. Classes are for students in Bahrain only.Tuition classes in Bahrain only

Common factors · 3 marks

If n and n + 3 have no factors in common, then n is not a multiple of 3.

Answer: Converse: If n is not a multiple of 3, then n and n + 3 have no factors in common. Both are true (‘no factors in common’ means no common factor other than 1).

Step-by-step solution

Given: n is a positive integer
To find: Frame the converse of this proposition. Then, determine if each of the two statements is true or not. Justify the true statements and give a counterexample for each false statement.

Idea: Any common factor of n and n + 3 also divides their difference, 3. So the only possible common factors are 1 and 3, and 3 is a common factor exactly when 3 divides n.

  1. Converse: If n is not a multiple of 3, then n and n + 3 have no factors in common.½ mark
  2. 1 divides every number, so ‘no factors in common’ means no common factor other than 1.
  3. Proposition — true. Suppose n were a multiple of 3: n = 3k. Then n + 3 = 3k + 3 = 3(k + 1) is also a multiple of 3, so 3 would be a common factor. That is not allowed, so n is not a multiple of 3.1 mark
  4. Converse. Let d be a common factor of n and n + 3. Then d divides their difference (n + 3) − n = 3, so d = 1 or d = 3.½ mark
  5. d = 3 would mean 3 divides n, which is ruled out. So d = 1: no common factor other than 1. The converse is true.½ mark
  6. So the proposition and its converse are both true.½ mark
Converse: If n is not a multiple of 3, then n and n + 3 have no factors in common. Both the proposition and its converse are true.

Check: n = 4: 4 and 7 share only 1 ✓. n = 10: 10 and 13 share only 1 ✓. n = 6 (a multiple of 3): 6 and 9 share 3 ✓.

Answer to write in the exam

Converse: If n is not a multiple of 3, then n and n + 3 have no factors in common.

(‘No factors in common’ = no common factor other than 1.)

Proposition: if n = 3k, then n + 3 = 3(k + 1), so 3 is a common factor — contradiction. ∴ 3 ∤ n. True.

Converse: common factor d divides (n + 3) − n = 3 ⇒ d = 1 or 3

3 ∤ n ⇒ d ≠ 3 ⇒ d = 1. True.

∴ Both the proposition and its converse are true.

Common mistakes that cost marks

  • Saying the proposition can never apply because 1 is always a common factor. ‘No factors in common’ ignores the factor 1.
  • Checking a few values of n and calling it a proof. Use the fact that a common factor divides the difference, 3.

How this can come in the exam

MCQ (1 mark)

What is the HCF of n and n + 3 when n = 25?

  1. 1
  2. 3
  3. 5
  4. 25
Show answer

(A) 1
25 is not a multiple of 3, so 25 and 28 have no common factor other than 1.

Short answer (2 marks)

Show that n and n + 2 have no common factor other than 1 whenever n is odd.

Show answerA common factor divides (n + 2) − n = 2, so it is 1 or 2 (1 mark). n is odd, so 2 does not divide n; the only common factor is 1 (1 mark).

Try one yourself

For which of n = 9, 10, 11, 12 do n and n + 3 have a common factor other than 1?

Show answer

n = 9 (9 and 12 share 3) and n = 12 (12 and 15 share 3) — exactly the multiples of 3.

More questions like this

All Mathematical reasoning questions · All maths questions