Learnify Academy is a tuition centre in Bahrain. Classes are for students in Bahrain only.Tuition classes in Bahrain only

Decimal expansions · 4 marks

A rational number has a terminating decimal expansion whose last non-zero digit occurs in the 4th decimal place. Show that such a number can be written in the form p104, where p is an integer not divisible by 10. Is it necessary that the denominator of this rational number, when written in the lowest form, is divisible by 24 or 54? Give reasons.

Answer: Multiplying by 104 moves all four decimal digits in front of the point, giving an integer p whose last digit is the non-zero 4th decimal digit, so 10 ∤ p. Yes: since 10 ∤ p, p cannot be divisible by both 2 and 5, so at least one of 24, 54 cannot cancel and stays in the lowest-form denominator. (It need not be divisible by both, e.g. 0.0005 = 12000 = 124 × 53.)

Step-by-step solution

Idea: A number with 4 decimal places is a whole number of ten-thousandths. In p24 × 54, cancelling can remove 2s only if p is even and 5s only if 5 divides p; it cannot do both, because 10 does not divide p.

  1. Let the number be x = N.d1d2d3d4, with d4 ≠ 0 (the last non-zero digit is in the 4th place). Then 104x = Nd1d2d3d4 is an integer; call it p. So x = p104.1 mark
  2. The units digit of p is d4 ≠ 0, so p does not end in 0: p is not divisible by 10. (Example: 3.1415 = 31415104, and 31415 ends in 5.)1 mark
  3. Now p104 = p24 × 54. Since 10 ∤ p, p is not divisible by both 2 and 5. If 2 ∤ p, no factor 2 cancels and 24 stays in the denominator. If 5 ∤ p, no factor 5 cancels and 54 stays.1 mark
  4. So yes, the lowest-form denominator is always divisible by 24 or by 54 (at least one of them). Not necessarily both: 0.0005 = 5104 = 12000 = 124 × 53 keeps 24 only, and 0.0016 = 16104 = 1625 = 154 keeps 54 only.1 mark
x = p/10⁴ with p ending in the non-zero 4th decimal digit, so 10 ∤ p. Yes: because p cannot be divisible by both 2 and 5, at least one of 2⁴ or 5⁴ always survives in the lowest-form denominator (not necessarily both).

Check: 0.0005: 2000 = 24 × 125 ✓ divisible by 16. 0.0016: 625 = 54 ✓. 0.0001 = 1104: divisible by both ✓.

Answer to write in the exam

x = N.d1d2d3d4, d4 ≠ 0

104x = p (an integer) ⇒ x = p104

Units digit of p = d4 ≠ 0 ⇒ 10 ∤ p

p104 = p24 × 54; 10 ∤ p ⇒ 2 ∤ p or 5 ∤ p

2 ∤ p ⇒ 24 remains in the denominator; 5 ∤ p ⇒ 54 remains

∴ Yes, the denominator in lowest form is divisible by 24 or 54 (e.g. 0.0005 = 124 × 53, 0.0016 = 154).

Common mistakes that cost marks

  • Saying the denominator must be divisible by both 24 and 54. Examples like 0.0016 = 1625 show it need not.
  • Saying p is not divisible by 2 (or by 5). p can be even (16) or a multiple of 5 (5); it just cannot be a multiple of 10.
  • Forgetting the whole-number part: 12.0034 = 120034104, not 34104.

How this can come in the exam

MCQ (1 mark)

0.0125 in lowest form is

  1. 1251000
  2. 180
  3. 5400
  4. 18
Show answer

(B) 180
12510000 = 180, and 80 = 24 × 5.

Short answer (2 marks)

A terminating decimal has its last non-zero digit in the 3rd decimal place, and in lowest form its denominator is 125. Give one such number and explain why the denominator is not divisible by 23.

Show answerFor example 0.008 = 81000 = 1125 (1 mark). Here p = 8 is divisible by 23, so all the 2s cancel; since 10 ∤ p, 5 ∤ p and 53 = 125 remains (1 mark).

Try one yourself

Write 2.0048 as p104 and in lowest form. Which of 24, 54 divides the denominator?

Show answer

20048104 = 1253625; the denominator is 54 (20048 = 24 × 1253).

More questions like this

All Number systems questions · All maths questions