Consider the growing pattern of squares shown in the figure. The first four stages of the pattern are shown. If we count the total number of green squares in the four stages of the pattern, we get the sequence 3, 6, 12, 24. Can you predict the number of squares in Stages 5 and 6 of the pattern? In Stages 10, 11 and 12? In Stage 20? At any stage? How is this different from the growing pattern in the figure?
Step-by-step solution
Idea: Each stage has twice as many squares as the stage before. So stage n is 3 doubled (n − 1) times. The earlier pattern added a fixed number instead.
- 3, 6, 12, 24: each term is 2 × the previous term (the number of rows doubles, 3 squares per row).½ mark
- Stage 5: 24 × 2 = 48; Stage 6: 48 × 2 = 96.½ mark
- Stage n: 3 × 2 × 2 × … (n − 1 twos) = 3 × 2n−1.1 mark
- Stage 10: 3 × 29 = 3 × 512 = 1536; Stage 11: 3072; Stage 12: 6144. Stage 20: 3 × 219 = 3 × 524288 = 1572864.1 mark
- Difference: the earlier pattern 1, 5, 9, 13, … adds the same 4 squares each stage (an AP, 4n − 3; stage 20 has only 77). This pattern multiplies by the same 2 each stage, so it grows much faster (stage 20 has 1572864).1 mark
Check: Stage 4: 3 × 2³ = 24 ✓. Stage 11 = 2 × Stage 10 = 2 × 1536 = 3072 ✓.
Answer to write in the exam
3, 6, 12, 24: each term = 2 × previous term
Stage 5 = 48, Stage 6 = 96
Stage n = 3 × 2n−1
Stage 10 = 3 × 29 = 1536, Stage 11 = 3072, Stage 12 = 6144
Stage 20 = 3 × 219 = 1572864
Earlier pattern: adds 4 each stage (4n − 3); this pattern: multiplies by 2 each stage
∴ This pattern grows much faster (stage 20: 1572864 against 77).
Common mistakes that cost marks
- Adding 3 each time (3, 6, 9, 12, …). Look again: 6 → 12 → 24 doubles; it does not add a fixed amount.
- Writing stage n as 3 × 2n (giving 6 at stage 1). Stage 1 has 3 squares, so the power is n − 1.
- Writing 3 × 219 as 619. Work out 219 first, then multiply by 3.
How this can come in the exam
A pattern has 5, 10, 20, 40, … tiles at stages 1, 2, 3, 4. The number of tiles at stage 8 is
- 320
- 640
- 1280
- 80
Show answer
(B) 640
5 × 27 = 5 × 128 = 640.
Assertion (A): By stage 10, a pattern with 3, 6, 12, … squares has more squares than a pattern with 1, 5, 9, … squares.
Reason (R): A pattern that multiplies by 2 at every stage eventually grows faster than one that adds a fixed number.
- Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.
- Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.
- A is true but R is false.
- A is false but R is true.
Show answer
(A) Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.
Stage 10: 1536 against 37. R explains A.
Try one yourself
A pattern has 2, 6, 18, 54, … squares at stages 1, 2, 3, 4. Find the number at stages 6 and n.
Show answer
Multiply by 3 each time: stage n = 2 × 3n−1; stage 6 = 2 × 243 = 486.
More questions like this
- Is 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, … a geometric progression? If so, what is the common ratio?
- Is 1, 3, 9, 27, 81, … a geometric progression? If so, what is the common ratio?
- Is 1, −1, 1, −1, 1, … a geometric progression? If so, what is the common ratio?
- Check whether the sequence 5, 154, 4516, 13564, … is a geometric progression and find its nth term.
- Check whether the following sequences are geometric progressions and find their nth terms.
All Sequences and progressions questions · All maths questions