Can you explain why we need q ≠ 0 in the definition of a rational number?
Step-by-step solution
Idea: Division is the reverse of multiplication: pq = r means r × q = p. Test this with q = 0.
- pq = r means q × r = p. (For example 123 = 4 because 3 × 4 = 12.)½ mark
- Take q = 0 and p ≠ 0, say 50. We would need 0 × r = 5, but 0 × r = 0 for every number r. No such r exists.½ mark
- Take q = 0 and p = 0: 00. Now 0 × r = 0 is true for every r, so there is no single answer.½ mark
- Either way p0 does not name one definite number, so it cannot be a rational number. That is why the definition insists on q ≠ 0.½ mark
Answer to write in the exam
pq = r means q × r = p
If q = 0 and p ≠ 0: 0 × r = p has no solution (0 × r = 0)
If q = 0 and p = 0: 0 × r = 0 for every r, so no single value
∴ p0 is not defined, so q ≠ 0 is needed.
Common mistakes that cost marks
- Saying 50 = 0 or 50 = 5. Neither is true, since 0 × 0 ≠ 5 and 0 × 5 ≠ 5.
- Confusing 05 with 50. 05 = 0 is a perfectly good rational number; only a zero denominator is forbidden.
- Saying ‘the answer is infinity’. Infinity is not a number on the number line, so it does not rescue the definition.
How this can come in the exam
Which of the following is NOT a rational number?
- 07
- −71
- 70
- 7−1
Show answer
(C) 70
70 has a zero denominator, so it is not defined. 07 = 0, −71 = −7 and 7−1 = −7 are rational.
Assertion (A): 0 is a rational number.
Reason (R): 0 can be written as 0q for any non-zero integer q.
- Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.
- Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.
- A is true but R is false.
- A is false but R is true.
Show answer
(A) Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.
0 = 01 = 05, which has the form pq with q ≠ 0. R explains A.
Try one yourself
For which value of x is 3x − 4 not a rational number?
Show answer
When x − 4 = 0, that is x = 4: the denominator becomes 0.